In recent times, the UK has witnessed a distressing surge in incidents involving dangerously out-of-control dogs, including fatal attacks. As a response to this alarming trend, the XL Bully breed has now been added to the list of banned breeds in the country. However, it is important to note that there will be no "XL Bully Cull," as existing dogs can remain with their current owners, provided they register them with an exemption certificate and adhere to new rules aimed at protecting public safety.
Under the new regulations, all XL bully dogs must wear a muzzle and be leashed in public. This measure aims to decrease the likelihood of dogs becoming out of control or creating problematic situations, ultimately reducing the chances of attacks. It is not only humans who have been victims of XL Bully attacks, but there have also been numerous dog-on-dog attacks that have caused distress to pet owners and harm to beloved pets.
To further address the issue, the legislation includes a compensation scheme for owners who wish to surrender their XL Bullies for euthanasia. This may encourage some owners to give up their problematic dogs, thereby mitigating potential risks. Tragically, there have been cases where owners have recognized the dangers posed by their dogs but were unable to prevent further harm. In one such instance in Scotland, an owner had decided to put down their easily startled and potentially aggressive dog, but before they could do so, it attacked elderly family members.
To date, approximately 200 animals have been euthanized, removing risky animals from the population. The new legislation also aims to put an end to the practice of passing unwanted dogs from owner to owner. It is not uncommon for dangerous dogs to be placed in environments where they can continue to cause problems, whether informally through gifting or selling at reduced prices, or even when rehomed by dog shelters, as tragically seen in the case of Natasha Johnston.
The legislation includes requirements for all XL Bully dogs to be spayed or neutered, as well as a ban on breeding, importation, and sales. These measures are expected to gradually reduce the population of XL Bullies. However, it is crucial to acknowledge potential weaknesses in the legislation's design, which may pose challenges in its enforcement.
Firstly, there has been no cull of dangerous dogs in the sense that existing dogs are exempted without having undergone a behavior assessment. Secondly, the muzzle and leash requirements do not protect against attacks that occur within the home, where the majority of incidents take place. This raises the question of whether the goal is solely the safety of the public when they are out and about, or if we should strive to protect all lives.
The effectiveness of the muzzle and leash requirements relies on their obedience, which may prove challenging to enforce. It is impractical to have police officers examining dogs in parks. Moreover, certain XL Bully owners and advocates have displayed reckless actions and an anti-authority stance. In an attempt to prevent the euthanasia of unwanted XL Bully dogs, some individuals have even transported them to Scotland. Shockingly, some of these animals, which were supposed to be adopted, were given up by their new owners within 24 hours due to their dangerous behavior towards children.
Despite overwhelming scientific evidence presented by Bully Watch, Dr. Lawrence Newport, and others, there are still organizations such as the RSPCA and Don't Ban Me Licence Me (DBMLM) that refuse to accept this evidence. Unfortunately, DBMLM has misled owners by misrepresenting their legal challenge as a genuine opportunity to reassess the ban, thereby encouraging them to delay applying for vital exemptions.
There are indications of continued illegal rehoming and selling of XL Bully dogs, suggesting that some individuals openly flout the law and will not take it seriously until they witness convictions. This raises concerns that many owners may have a false sense of security and fail to comprehend the gravity of a criminal record.
As questions persist and misinformation spreads, it is evident that the public debate surrounding the ban has not been conclusively won. This signals potential trouble ahead. If the proven risks associated with XL Bully dogs lead to another fatal attack within a home, it could reignite a dangerous wave of debate and public opposition.
It is crucial for society to prioritize public safety and take necessary measures to prevent further harm. While challenges in enforcing the legislation exist, it is imperative that we address them and work towards a safer future for all.
Jason King
Birmingham City-Desk
Comentários